Appearance

Personalize your experience

Mode
Accent Color
Direction
Fixed

Fixed

Basic

Equal size at every level — the safest, most predictable grid.

At a glance

Engine value
fixed
Size at level i
size(i) = base
Family
Basic — Same size at every rung — fully predictable capital use.
Risk band
Low risk
Capital profile
Linear — total = base × levels.
Best for
Ranging / sideways markets, capital preservation, first grids.
Orders per level
One entry order and one take-profit per level.
Ladder cost @ 10 levels
10.0× base lot
Versus a flat ladder
1.00× the capital
Deepest rung
1.00× base (1.00× the first rung)
Entry orders resting
10 at 10 levels
Break-even bounce
5.00% from the deepest fill (flat ladder: 5.00%)
★
Pro tip:A practical pick — one of the modes that holds up in trading rather than only on paper.

What this curve is for

The reference . Every rung commits the same size, so the ladder is a straight line in capital and the worst case is arithmetic you can do in your head: levels × . Fixed is not the timid choice — it is the choice that makes every other (levels, spread, target, leverage) legible, because nothing else is moving underneath them.

How the sizing rule works

Size at level i is exactly one base lot. Rung prices step arithmetically off the base by the spread, each fill gets one take-profit one target away, and a completed cycle re-arms the same rung at the same size. There is no state to reason about beyond which rungs are .

LevelPer-order sizeOrdersLevel totalCumulativeEntry priceTake-profit
L11.00×11.00×1.00×99.0099.99
L21.00×11.00×2.00×98.0098.98
L31.00×11.00×3.00×97.0097.97
L41.00×11.00×4.00×96.0096.96
L51.00×11.00×5.00×95.0095.95
L61.00×11.00×6.00×94.0094.94
L71.00×11.00×7.00×93.0093.93
L81.00×11.00×8.00×92.0092.92
L91.00×11.00×9.00×91.0091.91
L101.00×11.00×10.0×90.0090.90
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units.

The ladder, as the engine builds it

Below is the 's own ladder and the trading terminal's chart engine, both driven by buildLadderPlan for this . Change the level count, spread or target and the rung prices, sizes, and chart lines recompute exactly as they would in the .

base lot 100 USDT · long · no stop

Ladder shape — Fixed

LONG · base 100.00 (illustrative) · 10 levels stepping down · 1% apart

Base positionEntry rung (buy)Init target
Opening position & init targets200 USDT
T2
target 2 sell @ 102.00
+2 USDT
T1
target 1 sell @ 101.00
+1 USDT
L0
Market buy · 2 lots @ 100.00
200 USDT

Targets are stacked above the opening buy because a long grid exits higher than it enters.

Entry ladder

Limit buys below the base · L1 nearest, L10 deepest · every amount in USDT

Entry ladder: one row per rung, showing entry and exit price, size, order count, notional, margin, running capital and profit at exit.
LevelSize curveEntry buyUSDTExit sellUSDTFrom base%Sizebase lotsOrdersNotionalUSDTMarginUSDTCum. capitalUSDTProfit at exitUSDT
L1100%99.0099.991.00%1.00×11001003001
L2100%98.0098.982.00%1.00×11001004001
L3100%97.0097.973.00%1.00×11001005001
L4100%96.0096.964.00%1.00×11001006001
L5100%95.0095.955.00%1.00×11001007001
L6100%94.0094.946.00%1.00×11001008001
L7100%93.0093.937.00%1.00×11001009001
L8100%92.0092.928.00%1.00×11001001,0001
L9100%91.0091.919.00%1.00×11001001,1001
L10100%90.0090.9010.00%1.00×11001001,2001
Levels 1–10 of 10
1 / 1
Ladder cost 10.0×Capital 1,200 USDTAvg entry 95.42Cycle profit 13
Loading the chart engine…

What depth costs

Cost is exactly linear in depth, so doubling the levels doubles the commitment and the coverage. This is the only family where capital planning needs no model: reserve levels × ÷ leverage and you are funded for the full ladder.

LevelsLadder costDeepest rungEntry ordersCost vs 5 levelsCoverage
5 levels5.00×1.00×51.00×5%
10 levels10.0×1.00×102.00×10%
20 levels20.0×1.00×204.00×20%
40 levels40.0×1.00×408.00×40%
Ladder cost is Σ of every rung in base-lot units, excluding the opening L0 batch. At a grid size of 100 USDT, the 10-level ladder commits 1,000 USDT of notional at 1× leverage.

Read the cost vs 5 levels column as the escalation test. A flat ladder doubles when the depth doubles; anything materially above that is a whose coverage has to be bought rather than simply configured.

Capital budgetLevels affordableAdverse move covered
10× base10 levels10.0%
25× base25 levels25.0%
50× base50 levels50.0%
100× base100 levels100.0%
250× base200 levels200.0%
How far price can move against the grid before it runs out of rungs, per capital budget, at 1% spacing. This is the question a funding decision actually turns on.

Averaging and recovery

With every rung , the volume-weighted average entry is 94.50 against a base of 100 and a deepest rung of 90.00 — so the average sits 55% of the way down the covered range. Getting back to flat from the bottom therefore needs a 5.00% , against 5.00% for a flat ladder of the same depth — effectively identical.

ExcursionLevels filledDeployedAverage entryMarkUnrealisedBounce to flat
Shallow dipL1–L33.00×98.0097.00-0.03×1.03%
Half the ladder fillsL1–L55.00×97.0095.00-0.10×2.11%
Full ladderL1–L1010.0×94.5090.00-0.47×5.00%
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Deterministic arithmetic, not a simulation: no assumption is made about how price reached each depth.

Every rung is identical, so the average entry is the plain arithmetic mean of the levels and the needed to break even is roughly half the distance travelled. Deep ladders stay affordable, which is why fixed is the only growth-free that is genuinely usable at forty or a hundred levels.

Where the exposure sits

Held by the shallowest quarter
30.0% of total size
Held by the deepest quarter
30.0% of total size
Unrealised loss at full fill
0.47× base (4.7% of deployed capital)
Profit if every rung books its target
0.10× base
One shallow cycle, against reserved capital
10.0 bps

The last row is the metric that separates modes. Profit for a full cycle is the target of deployed capital in every , so it cannot discriminate. What differs is how much capital has to sit reserved to earn one shallow cycle: this mode 10.0× base to collect 10.0 bps of it when the first rung completes.

Which market pays this curve

Ranging and mean-reverting markets, where the comes from repetition rather than from averaging down. Fixed also fits any you are metering for the first time: it isolates whether your spread and target survive the instrument's fee and volatility profile, without a flattering the result.

Every rung of the ladder uses the same . Capital usage is perfectly linear and knowable up front, so it is impossible to blow up from position . Recovery from is the slowest of all modes because deep levels do not add extra size to average down.

The shape of the risk

The risk is not , it is coverage. A flat ladder that runs out of rungs stops averaging entirely and simply holds a losing position, so the failure is a trend that exits the covered range — not a capital . Loss at any depth is proportional, never convex.

ℹ
Note:Nothing surprising. If a fixed ladder disappoints, the diagnosis is in the spread, the target, the fee, or the coverage — and that clarity is precisely why it is the to start with.

Run it over real history

This is the product's grid backtester, not a summary of one. It fetches public candles for the you pick, rebuilds the ladder on the first candle of the , then applies the engine's own fill, take-profit, and stop-loss rules bar by bar. The caveat block inside the is part of the output — read it before trusting a number.

Instrument

BTCUSD

delta-india

Fixed · 10 levels @ 1% · target 1% · 100 USDT / level · 1× · long · no stop

What this does not model

  • Exact intrabar ticks. Bullish/doji candles use open → low → high → close; bearish candles use open → high → low → close. Finer timeframes reduce sensitivity to this deterministic assumption.
  • Queue position. Limit orders are assumed filled when touched, which flatters a maker grid in fast markets.
  • Margin rejection and liquidation. Deep rungs fill here even if the account could not fund them — check the capital requirement.
  • Slippage and funding. Only the fee you set above is charged; funding, borrow and slippage are absent.

Run the ladder over real history

The grid is rebuilt anchored on the first candle of the window, then the engine's own fill, exit, refill and stop-loss rules are applied bar by bar. You get the real fill sequence for this configuration on this instrument.

Measured against other modes

First the arithmetic, then the market. The below is computed from the size curves alone; the underneath replays every one of those ladders over the same real candle , with grid_mode as the only variable.

ModeLadder costDeepest rungBreak-even bounceEntry ordersShallow cycle
Fixed (this mode)10.0×1.00×5.00%1010.0 bps
Square-Root Decay4.32×0.30×5.85%1016.4 bps
Exponential Decay1.00×0.00×8.90%1050.0 bps
Linear Martingale55.0×10.0×2.38%551.8 bps
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Peers are chosen from this mode's own direction plus the flat baseline, so the comparison is meaningful rather than decorative.

Nothing is precomputed here. Press run and the backtester fetches one candle window and replays 4 ladders across it — identical settings, identical bars, grid_mode as the only difference.

When to use it

  • First on a new , before you have on how it actually .
  • Ranging or sideways regimes where cycle frequency is the edge.
  • Any mandate where the maximum loss has to be stated up front and defended.
  • Deep ladders — 50 levels of fixed costs what 10 levels of costs.

When to avoid it

  • You need to recover a deep quickly; flat gives you no leverage over your own average entry.
  • The reverts violently and you want to exploit the reversion — a growth monetises that better.

Tuning

  • Tune levels and spread, not size. Coverage = levels × spread is the only lever fixed gives you over survival.
  • If cycles are rare, the spread is too wide for the 's volatility, not the 's fault.
  • If cycles are frequent but P&L is flat, the target is too close to the fee .

Running it in production

  • Track cycles per day against the 's realised volatility — fixed lives or dies on fill frequency.
  • Watch the deepest level as a coverage gauge: consistently reaching the last rung means the range assumption is wrong.
  • Because capital is linear, a fixed ladder is safe to extend mid-life; adding levels costs exactly one lot each.

How it fails

  1. 1
    Coverage exhaustion
    Price leaves the covered range and the ladder holds a full position with no rungs left. Nothing escalates, but nothing recovers either until price returns. The fix is coverage (levels × spread) or a stop, not a different .
  2. 2
    Fee erosion
    A target set close to -trip fees a high cycle count into a slow bleed. Fixed makes this easy to spot because the per-cycle profit is identical every time; if realised P&L is flat while cycles climb, the target is the problem.

Claims worth correcting

“Fixed is for beginners.”

Fixed is what every other is measured against. Most production grids that survive a year are flat or capped, because their worst case was knowable before .

“Flat means low return.”

Return per cycle is the target in every . Growth curves change the recovery profile and the capital requirement, not the yield of an individual cycle.

Interaction with the rest of the configuration

  • Pairs naturally with : because every rung costs the same, shifting the window is cheap and predictable.
  • Spread sets how fast the ladder consumes depth. Widening it buys coverage for the same level count at the cost of fewer .
  • Target sets what each cycle books. Below -trip fees plus slippage, a grid is a fee generator regardless of the .
  • The is the only bound on the tail. Without it, the 's worst case is whatever the market does, not what you planned.

Questions this mode raises

  1. 1
    Is fixed the same as DCA fixed?
    Mathematically yes — `dca_fixed` is an alias. The distinction is framing: DCA describes accumulation you intend to hold, fixed describes a grid you intend to cycle.
  2. 2
    How deep can I safely go?
    As deep as levels × ÷ leverage fits inside your reserved capital with room for the position to be underwater. That is the whole calculation — there is no to model.

Where these numbers come from

  • Sizes and capital: levelMultiplier / gridModeCurve in lib/grid/gridModes.ts, from grid_modes.hpp and the Python engine's lot calculator.
  • Rung and exit prices, , init targets and the stop line: buildLadderPlan — the same builder the and use.
  • Backtest , cycles and P&L: runBacktest / runBacktestSweep over public broker candles, applying the engine's fill, exit, and stop rules.
  • Price charts: the trading terminal's chart engine, with the ladder drawn through its own price-line API.
!
Caution:A backtest is evidence about one , not a . Fees are charged at the rate you set; slippage, funding, , margin rejection and are not modelled. For a growth especially, a profitable window mostly tells you the window did not contain the trend that would have tested it.

Related

  • 1.Grid Modes — Overview — The full taxonomy and how to choose
  • 2.Basic family — What every curve in this family has in common
  • 3.Capital Allocation — Sizing an account to a Fixed ladder
  • 4.Stop Loss — Bounding this curve's tail
  • 5.Reading the Ladder Plan — Verifying the curve before deploying
  • 6.Grid Structure — Levels, init batch and base size

Related articles

  • Basic family

    Automation / Grid Modes / Families

    One size at every rung. The reference point against which every other family is measured.

  • Fixed DCA

    Automation / Grid Modes / DCA

    Fixed DCA explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / DCA reference.

  • Anti-Martingale

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Anti-Martingale explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Capped Linear

    Automation / Grid Modes / Capped

    Capped Linear explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Capped reference.

  • Exponential Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Exponential Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Geometric Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Geometric Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Half-Slope Inverse

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Half-Slope Inverse explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Harmonic

    Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic

    Harmonic explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic reference.

  • Inverse Fibonacci

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Inverse Fibonacci explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

Browse all knowledge base articles →