Appearance

Personalize your experience

Mode
Accent Color
Direction
Fixed DCA

Fixed DCA

DCA

Constant deployment, investing style.

At a glance

Engine value
dca_fixed
Size at level i
size(i) = base
Family
DCA — Accumulation-style rather than active .
Risk band
Low risk
Capital profile
Linear — total = base × levels.
Best for
Long-term accumulation; spot investing; HODL ladders.
Orders per level
One entry order and one take-profit per level.
Ladder cost @ 10 levels
10.0× base lot
Versus a flat ladder
1.00× the capital
Deepest rung
1.00× base (1.00× the first rung)
Entry orders resting
10 at 10 levels
Break-even bounce
5.00% from the deepest fill (flat ladder: 5.00%)
Alias of
fixed
ℹ
Note:This is an alias of fixed. The engine computes identical sizes for both; the separate entry exists so and mandates can label the in their own vocabulary.

What this curve is for

framed as accumulation. Identical math to `fixed`; the distinction is intent — a DCA ladder is deployed to build a position at an average price you are content to hold, not to harvest a range and flatten.

How the sizing rule works

One base lot at every level, with the same rung geometry and take-profit behaviour as . The engine cannot tell the two apart; the difference is in how the operator treats the resulting inventory.

LevelPer-order sizeOrdersLevel totalCumulativeEntry priceTake-profit
L11.00×11.00×1.00×99.0099.99
L21.00×11.00×2.00×98.0098.98
L31.00×11.00×3.00×97.0097.97
L41.00×11.00×4.00×96.0096.96
L51.00×11.00×5.00×95.0095.95
L61.00×11.00×6.00×94.0094.94
L71.00×11.00×7.00×93.0093.93
L81.00×11.00×8.00×92.0092.92
L91.00×11.00×9.00×91.0091.91
L101.00×11.00×10.0×90.0090.90
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units.

The ladder, as the engine builds it

Below is the 's own ladder and the trading terminal's chart engine, both driven by buildLadderPlan for this . Change the level count, spread or target and the rung prices, sizes, and chart lines recompute exactly as they would in the .

base lot 100 USDT · long · no stop

Ladder shape — Fixed DCA

LONG · base 100.00 (illustrative) · 10 levels stepping down · 1% apart

Base positionEntry rung (buy)Init target
Opening position & init targets200 USDT
T2
target 2 sell @ 102.00
+2 USDT
T1
target 1 sell @ 101.00
+1 USDT
L0
Market buy · 2 lots @ 100.00
200 USDT

Targets are stacked above the opening buy because a long grid exits higher than it enters.

Entry ladder

Limit buys below the base · L1 nearest, L10 deepest · every amount in USDT

Entry ladder: one row per rung, showing entry and exit price, size, order count, notional, margin, running capital and profit at exit.
LevelSize curveEntry buyUSDTExit sellUSDTFrom base%Sizebase lotsOrdersNotionalUSDTMarginUSDTCum. capitalUSDTProfit at exitUSDT
L1100%99.0099.991.00%1.00×11001003001
L2100%98.0098.982.00%1.00×11001004001
L3100%97.0097.973.00%1.00×11001005001
L4100%96.0096.964.00%1.00×11001006001
L5100%95.0095.955.00%1.00×11001007001
L6100%94.0094.946.00%1.00×11001008001
L7100%93.0093.937.00%1.00×11001009001
L8100%92.0092.928.00%1.00×11001001,0001
L9100%91.0091.919.00%1.00×11001001,1001
L10100%90.0090.9010.00%1.00×11001001,2001
Levels 1–10 of 10
1 / 1
Ladder cost 10.0×Capital 1,200 USDTAvg entry 95.42Cycle profit 13
Loading the chart engine…

What depth costs

Exactly linear in depth. Reserve levels × and the is fully funded.

LevelsLadder costDeepest rungEntry ordersCost vs 5 levelsCoverage
5 levels5.00×1.00×51.00×5%
10 levels10.0×1.00×102.00×10%
20 levels20.0×1.00×204.00×20%
40 levels40.0×1.00×408.00×40%
Ladder cost is Σ of every rung in base-lot units, excluding the opening L0 batch. At a grid size of 100 USDT, the 10-level ladder commits 1,000 USDT of notional at 1× leverage.

Read the cost vs 5 levels column as the escalation test. A flat ladder doubles when the depth doubles; anything materially above that is a whose coverage has to be bought rather than simply configured.

Capital budgetLevels affordableAdverse move covered
10× base10 levels10.0%
25× base25 levels25.0%
50× base50 levels50.0%
100× base100 levels100.0%
250× base200 levels200.0%
How far price can move against the grid before it runs out of rungs, per capital budget, at 1% spacing. This is the question a funding decision actually turns on.

Averaging and recovery

With every rung , the volume-weighted average entry is 94.50 against a base of 100 and a deepest rung of 90.00 — so the average sits 55% of the way down the covered range. Getting back to flat from the bottom therefore needs a 5.00% , against 5.00% for a flat ladder of the same depth — effectively identical.

ExcursionLevels filledDeployedAverage entryMarkUnrealisedBounce to flat
Shallow dipL1–L33.00×98.0097.00-0.03×1.03%
Half the ladder fillsL1–L55.00×97.0095.00-0.10×2.11%
Full ladderL1–L1010.0×94.5090.00-0.47×5.00%
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Deterministic arithmetic, not a simulation: no assumption is made about how price reached each depth.

Identical at every level, framed as accumulation rather than active . Capital is exactly linear in depth.

Where the exposure sits

Held by the shallowest quarter
30.0% of total size
Held by the deepest quarter
30.0% of total size
Unrealised loss at full fill
0.47× base (4.7% of deployed capital)
Profit if every rung books its target
0.10× base
One shallow cycle, against reserved capital
10.0 bps

The last row is the metric that separates modes. Profit for a full cycle is the target of deployed capital in every , so it cannot discriminate. What differs is how much capital has to sit reserved to earn one shallow cycle: this mode 10.0× base to collect 10.0 bps of it when the first rung completes.

Which market pays this curve

Long-horizon accumulation on instruments you want to own, especially spot ladders where the position is the and the cycles are a bonus.

Deploys the same size at each level like , but framed as dollar-cost-averaging accumulation rather than active . Predictable, steady, low-stress.

The shape of the risk

Coverage exhaustion, and the behavioural risk specific to accumulation: a to hold can quietly become an inability to exit.

ℹ
Note:Alias of ``.

Run it over real history

This is the product's grid backtester, not a summary of one. It fetches public candles for the you pick, rebuilds the ladder on the first candle of the , then applies the engine's own fill, take-profit, and stop-loss rules bar by bar. The caveat block inside the is part of the output — read it before trusting a number.

Instrument

BTCUSD

delta-india

Fixed DCA · 10 levels @ 1% · target 1% · 100 USDT / level · 1× · long · no stop

What this does not model

  • Exact intrabar ticks. Bullish/doji candles use open → low → high → close; bearish candles use open → high → low → close. Finer timeframes reduce sensitivity to this deterministic assumption.
  • Queue position. Limit orders are assumed filled when touched, which flatters a maker grid in fast markets.
  • Margin rejection and liquidation. Deep rungs fill here even if the account could not fund them — check the capital requirement.
  • Slippage and funding. Only the fee you set above is charged; funding, borrow and slippage are absent.

Run the ladder over real history

The grid is rebuilt anchored on the first candle of the window, then the engine's own fill, exit, refill and stop-loss rules are applied bar by bar. You get the real fill sequence for this configuration on this instrument.

Measured against other modes

First the arithmetic, then the market. The below is computed from the size curves alone; the underneath replays every one of those ladders over the same real candle , with grid_mode as the only variable.

ModeLadder costDeepest rungBreak-even bounceEntry ordersShallow cycle
Fixed DCA (this mode)10.0×1.00×5.00%1010.0 bps
Fixed10.0×1.00×5.00%1010.0 bps
Square-Root Decay4.32×0.30×5.85%1016.4 bps
Exponential Decay1.00×0.00×8.90%1050.0 bps
Linear Martingale55.0×10.0×2.38%551.8 bps
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Peers are chosen from this mode's own direction plus the flat baseline, so the comparison is meaningful rather than decorative.

Nothing is precomputed here. Press run and the backtester fetches one candle window and replays 5 ladders across it — identical settings, identical bars, grid_mode as the only difference.

When to use it

  • Long-term accumulation with a defined average .
  • Spot ladders where you intend to hold the inventory.
  • Low-stress, predictable schedules.

When to avoid it

  • You are trying to harvest a range — use `` so the reporting matches the intent.

Tuning

  • Spread and depth define the accumulation range; choose them from where you want the average price to land.
  • Target defines how much of the inventory recycles; a wide target keeps more of the position.

Running it in production

  • Track average entry as the primary metric — for an accumulation ladder it is the outcome, not a diagnostic.
  • Watch how much inventory the take-profits are recycling; if it is most of it, this is a grid, not accumulation.

How it fails

  1. 1
    Accidental trading
    A tight target recycles the inventory you meant to accumulate. Widen the target or reduce init targets if the position keeps flattening.
  2. 2
    Coverage exhaustion
    The accumulation range ends before the decline does, leaving a full position and no further rungs.

Claims worth correcting

“DCA is safer than .”

The is identical to . What differs is the exit intent, and intent does not change the -to-market.

Interaction with the rest of the configuration

  • Spread sets how fast the ladder consumes depth. Widening it buys coverage for the same level count at the cost of fewer .
  • Target sets what each cycle books. Below -trip fees plus slippage, a grid is a fee generator regardless of the .
  • The is the only bound on the tail. Without it, the 's worst case is whatever the market does, not what you planned.

Questions this mode raises

  1. 1
    Why have a separate value at all?
    So reporting and reviews can distinguish accumulation mandates from range-harvesting ones without inspecting every parameter.

Where these numbers come from

  • Sizes and capital: levelMultiplier / gridModeCurve in lib/grid/gridModes.ts, from grid_modes.hpp and the Python engine's lot calculator.
  • Rung and exit prices, , init targets and the stop line: buildLadderPlan — the same builder the and use.
  • Backtest , cycles and P&L: runBacktest / runBacktestSweep over public broker candles, applying the engine's fill, exit, and stop rules.
  • Price charts: the trading terminal's chart engine, with the ladder drawn through its own price-line API.
!
Caution:A backtest is evidence about one , not a . Fees are charged at the rate you set; slippage, funding, , margin rejection and are not modelled. For a growth especially, a profitable window mostly tells you the window did not contain the trend that would have tested it.

Related

  • 1.Grid Modes — Overview — The full taxonomy and how to choose
  • 2.DCA family — What every curve in this family has in common
  • 3.Capital Allocation — Sizing an account to a Fixed DCA ladder
  • 4.Stop Loss — Bounding this curve's tail
  • 5.Reading the Ladder Plan — Verifying the curve before deploying
  • 6.Grid Structure — Levels, init batch and base size

Related articles

  • Ramped DCA

    Automation / Grid Modes / DCA

    Ramped DCA explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / DCA reference.

  • DCA family

    Automation / Grid Modes / Families

    Accumulation-style deployment rather than active range harvesting.

  • Fixed

    Automation / Grid Modes / Basic

    Fixed explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Basic reference.

  • Harmonic

    Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic

    Harmonic explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic reference.

  • Anti-Martingale

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Anti-Martingale explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Capped Linear

    Automation / Grid Modes / Capped

    Capped Linear explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Capped reference.

  • Exponential Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Exponential Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Geometric Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Geometric Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Geometric Ratio

    Automation / Grid Modes / Geometric

    Geometric Ratio explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Geometric reference.

Browse all knowledge base articles →