Appearance

Personalize your experience

Mode
Accent Color
Direction
Half-Slope Inverse

Half-Slope Inverse

Anti-Martingale

Gentle harmonic-style decay.

At a glance

Engine value
anti_marti_half
Size at level i
size(i) = base / (1 + 0.5·i)
Family
— Size shrinks deeper into — capital protection first.
Risk band
Low risk
Capital profile
total = base × Σ1/(1 + 0.5i).
Best for
Mild trends with slower de-risking than .
Orders per level
One entry order and one take-profit per level.
Ladder cost @ 10 levels
3.21× base lot
Versus a flat ladder
0.32× the capital
Deepest rung
0.17× base (0.25× the first rung)
Entry orders resting
10 at 10 levels
Break-even bounce
6.40% from the deepest fill (flat ladder: 5.00%)

What this curve is for

Half-slope inverse: size is 1/(1 + m·i) with m defaulting to 0.5. It decays more slowly than the plain , so deep levels stay relevant longer, and the slope is tunable — making it the decay counterpart to growth.

How the sizing rule works

The divisor grows linearly at rate m. Lowering m flattens the taper toward ; raising it approaches the standard and beyond.

LevelPer-order sizeOrdersLevel totalCumulativeEntry priceTake-profit
L10.67×10.67×0.67×99.0099.99
L20.50×10.50×1.17×98.0098.98
L30.40×10.40×1.57×97.0097.97
L40.33×10.33×1.90×96.0096.96
L50.29×10.29×2.19×95.0095.95
L60.25×10.25×2.44×94.0094.94
L70.22×10.22×2.66×93.0093.93
L80.20×10.20×2.86×92.0092.92
L90.18×10.18×3.04×91.0091.91
L100.17×10.17×3.21×90.0090.90
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units.

The ladder, as the engine builds it

Below is the 's own ladder and the trading terminal's chart engine, both driven by buildLadderPlan for this . Change the level count, spread or target and the rung prices, sizes, and chart lines recompute exactly as they would in the .

base lot 100 USDT · long · no stop

Ladder shape — Half-Slope Inverse

LONG · base 100.00 (illustrative) · 10 levels stepping down · 1% apart

Base positionEntry rung (buy)Init target
Opening position & init targets200 USDT
T2
target 2 sell @ 102.00
+2 USDT
T1
target 1 sell @ 101.00
+1 USDT
L0
Market buy · 2 lots @ 100.00
200 USDT

Targets are stacked above the opening buy because a long grid exits higher than it enters.

Entry ladder

Limit buys below the base · L1 nearest, L10 deepest · every amount in USDT

Entry ladder: one row per rung, showing entry and exit price, size, order count, notional, margin, running capital and profit at exit.
LevelSize curveEntry buyUSDTExit sellUSDTFrom base%Sizebase lotsOrdersNotionalUSDTMarginUSDTCum. capitalUSDTProfit at exitUSDT
L1100%99.0099.991.00%0.667×166.6766.672670.67
L275%98.0098.982.00%0.500×150503170.5
L360%97.0097.973.00%0.400×140403570.4
L450%96.0096.964.00%0.333×133.3333.333900.33
L543%95.0095.955.00%0.286×128.5728.574190.29
L638%94.0094.946.00%0.250×125254440.25
L733%93.0093.937.00%0.222×122.2222.224660.22
L830%92.0092.928.00%0.200×120204860.2
L927%91.0091.919.00%0.182×118.1818.185040.18
L1025%90.0090.9010.00%0.167×116.6716.675210.17
Levels 1–10 of 10
1 / 1
Ladder cost 3.21×Capital 521 USDTAvg entry 97.39Cycle profit 6.21
Loading the chart engine…

What depth costs

Light and predictable, growing slowly with depth. Coverage is cheap, so wide ladders are the use.

LevelsLadder costDeepest rungEntry ordersCost vs 5 levelsCoverage
5 levels2.19×0.29×51.00×5%
10 levels3.21×0.17×101.47×10%
20 levels4.38×0.09×202.00×20%
40 levels5.65×0.05×402.59×40%
Ladder cost is Σ of every rung in base-lot units, excluding the opening L0 batch. At a grid size of 100 USDT, the 10-level ladder commits 321 USDT of notional at 1× leverage.

Read the cost vs 5 levels column as the escalation test. A flat ladder doubles when the depth doubles; anything materially above that is a whose coverage has to be bought rather than simply configured.

Capital budgetLevels affordableAdverse move covered
10× base200 levels200.0%
25× base200 levels200.0%
50× base200 levels200.0%
100× base200 levels200.0%
250× base200 levels200.0%
How far price can move against the grid before it runs out of rungs, per capital budget, at 1% spacing. This is the question a funding decision actually turns on.

Averaging and recovery

With every rung , the volume-weighted average entry is 95.76 against a base of 100 and a deepest rung of 90.00 — so the average sits 42% of the way down the covered range. Getting back to flat from the bottom therefore needs a 6.40% , against 5.00% for a flat ladder of the same depth — 1.40% more work.

ExcursionLevels filledDeployedAverage entryMarkUnrealisedBounce to flat
Shallow dipL1–L31.57×98.1797.00-0.02×1.21%
Half the ladder fillsL1–L52.19×97.4295.00-0.05×2.55%
Full ladderL1–L103.21×95.7690.00-0.19×6.40%
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Deterministic arithmetic, not a simulation: no assumption is made about how price reached each depth.

A softer version of the linear-inverse taper: the denominator grows at half speed, so decay is slower and deep levels stay relevant longer.

Where the exposure sits

Held by the shallowest quarter
48.9% of total size
Held by the deepest quarter
17.1% of total size
Unrealised loss at full fill
0.19× base (5.9% of deployed capital)
Profit if every rung books its target
0.03× base
One shallow cycle, against reserved capital
20.8 bps

The last row is the metric that separates modes. Profit for a full cycle is the target of deployed capital in every , so it cannot discriminate. What differs is how much capital has to sit reserved to earn one shallow cycle: this mode 3.21× base to collect 20.8 bps of it when the first rung completes.

Which market pays this curve

Mild trends where the standard taper de-risks faster than you want.

A softer version of the linear-inverse : the denominator grows at half speed, so size decays more slowly and deep levels stay more meaningful. Floored at 1 lot.

The shape of the risk

Low capital risk; declines gently. The tunable slope means the same can express two quite different policies, so record m with the .

ℹ
Note:The slope is tunable, so you can dial the decay rate directly.

Run it over real history

This is the product's grid backtester, not a summary of one. It fetches public candles for the you pick, rebuilds the ladder on the first candle of the , then applies the engine's own fill, take-profit, and stop-loss rules bar by bar. The caveat block inside the is part of the output — read it before trusting a number.

Instrument

BTCUSD

delta-india

Half-Slope Inverse · 10 levels @ 1% · target 1% · 100 USDT / level · 1× · long · no stop

What this does not model

  • Exact intrabar ticks. Bullish/doji candles use open → low → high → close; bearish candles use open → high → low → close. Finer timeframes reduce sensitivity to this deterministic assumption.
  • Queue position. Limit orders are assumed filled when touched, which flatters a maker grid in fast markets.
  • Margin rejection and liquidation. Deep rungs fill here even if the account could not fund them — check the capital requirement.
  • Slippage and funding. Only the fee you set above is charged; funding, borrow and slippage are absent.

Run the ladder over real history

The grid is rebuilt anchored on the first candle of the window, then the engine's own fill, exit, refill and stop-loss rules are applied bar by bar. You get the real fill sequence for this configuration on this instrument.

Measured against other modes

First the arithmetic, then the market. The below is computed from the size curves alone; the underneath replays every one of those ladders over the same real candle , with grid_mode as the only variable.

ModeLadder costDeepest rungBreak-even bounceEntry ordersShallow cycle
Half-Slope Inverse (this mode)3.21×0.17×6.40%1020.8 bps
Fixed10.0×1.00×5.00%1010.0 bps
Square-Root Decay4.32×0.30×5.85%1016.4 bps
Exponential Decay1.00×0.00×8.90%1050.0 bps
Linear Martingale55.0×10.0×2.38%551.8 bps
Reference configuration: 10 levels, 1% apart, 1% target, base price 100, long. Sizes are in base-lot units. Peers are chosen from this mode's own direction plus the flat baseline, so the comparison is meaningful rather than decorative.

Nothing is precomputed here. Press run and the backtester fetches one candle window and replays 5 ladders across it — identical settings, identical bars, grid_mode as the only difference.

When to use it

  • Mild trends with slower de-risking than plain .
  • You want a decay where level 10 still carries real size.

When to avoid it

  • Strong trends where you want exposure to collapse quickly.
  • You need a bounded total regardless of depth — gives that, this does not.

Tuning

  • m = 0.25 keeps almost the full ladder meaningful; m = 1 approaches the .
  • Verify where the one-lot lands for your chosen m; it moves substantially with the slope.

This is parametric. The and the settings show only the dial(s) it actually uses, and changing one is a structural — the resting ladder is cancelled and re-placed at the new sizes.

Slope (m)
Per-level slope in size = base · (1 + m·i). 0.5 gives 1.5×, 2×, 2.5×… Default 0.5, range 0.1–2.
★
Pro tip:After changing a tunable, re-read the capital above and re-run the . A dial that looks cosmetic on a can be a change to the worst case.

Running it in production

  • Watch how quickly executed size hits the one-lot — beyond that extra levels add coverage but almost no averaging.
  • Track realised cycles per day. Decay curves earn from frequency, so a falling cycle count is the signal that the market has left the .
  • Check the gap between average entry and . Decay curves keep it wide by design, so recovery expectations must be set from it, not from hope.

How it fails

  1. 1
    Slope ambiguity
    Two deployments of the same with different m are different strategies. The mode name alone is not a .

Claims worth correcting

“Slower decay means more risk.”

It means more . Whether that is risk depends on the regime — in a range it is exactly what you want.

Interaction with the rest of the configuration

  • Spread sets how fast the ladder consumes depth. Widening it buys coverage for the same level count at the cost of fewer .
  • Target sets what each cycle books. Below -trip fees plus slippage, a grid is a fee generator regardless of the .
  • The is the only bound on the tail. Without it, the 's worst case is whatever the market does, not what you planned.

Questions this mode raises

  1. 1
    Is this closer to fixed or to anti-martingale?
    At the default slope, in between. At m = 0.25 it is much closer to ; at m = 1 it is the .

Where these numbers come from

  • Sizes and capital: levelMultiplier / gridModeCurve in lib/grid/gridModes.ts, from grid_modes.hpp and the Python engine's lot calculator.
  • Rung and exit prices, , init targets and the stop line: buildLadderPlan — the same builder the and use.
  • Backtest , cycles and P&L: runBacktest / runBacktestSweep over public broker candles, applying the engine's fill, exit, and stop rules.
  • Price charts: the trading terminal's chart engine, with the ladder drawn through its own price-line API.
!
Caution:A backtest is evidence about one , not a . Fees are charged at the rate you set; slippage, funding, , margin rejection and are not modelled. For a growth especially, a profitable window mostly tells you the window did not contain the trend that would have tested it.

Related

  • 1.Grid Modes — Overview — The full taxonomy and how to choose
  • 2.Anti-Martingale family — What every curve in this family has in common
  • 3.Capital Allocation — Sizing an account to a Half-Slope Inverse ladder
  • 4.Stop Loss — Bounding this curve's tail
  • 5.Reading the Ladder Plan — Verifying the curve before deploying
  • 6.Grid Structure — Levels, init batch and base size

Related articles

  • Anti-Martingale

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Anti-Martingale explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Exponential Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Exponential Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Geometric Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Geometric Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Inverse Fibonacci

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Inverse Fibonacci explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Linear Subtractive

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Linear Subtractive explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Logarithmic Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Logarithmic Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Square-Root Decay

    Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale

    Square-Root Decay explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Anti-Martingale reference.

  • Anti-Martingale family

    Automation / Grid Modes / Families

    Size shrinks as the ladder deepens. Capital protection first, recovery second.

  • Harmonic

    Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic

    Harmonic explained: how it works in QuaTick, settings and worked examples. Part of the Automation / Grid Modes / Harmonic reference.

Browse all knowledge base articles →